🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of nations are considering similar measures.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and apps are "robbing our children's innocence". The policy is expected to be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to enact a bill increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a good first step," commented a leading European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Previously, support built behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. However, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. An organization set up by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful online content contends that a simple age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create tools that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, action is largely occurring at the regional level amid national inaction.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further access needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced measures demanding parental consent for minors to open social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from various figures to copy Australia's path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Apart from these regions, further states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might backfire". The body points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve safety.

While this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and others demonstrate that governments around the world are increasingly willing to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.